In the final example above I’ve circled the hidden subject just to help. And, I must admit this is one I hadn’t spotted, which is wonderful! Whilst giving a talk about this body of work someone in the audience pointed out that they saw a Diplodocus in the pattern on the rock. I’d been looking at this work on and off for 2 years, had shot it, edited it, curated it, made a book out of it and never spotted that at all! For me the image was based around that curved ‘wave’ of rock which I linked to the sea and water themes throughout the collection. I was in a sense blinded by my own obsession with that ‘wave’ that I couldn’t see what was right in front of me.
So, a couple of thoughts to end on:
1) I don’t think it’s possible to always go seeking out these shapes or similarities per se. It would be very easy to create a rather contrived body of work if you force it. Rather it often comes from a deeper and more long-term connection with a particular landscape that you grow to know more intimately. Visiting, re-visiting, recognising the changes and subtle differences through the seasons and of shape and form. Without being too much of a hippy about it, I suspect these things sometimes need to come to you when you are in a receptive frame of mind rather than being sought out.
2) Perhaps it’s good to remember that everyone brings their own eyes, thoughts, fears, hopes and visual baggage to each image. I personally think it’s great when viewers pull something different out that even the creator hasn’t spotted. After all, for every smell, taste or feeling we all experience as humans each is 100% unique to ourselves, and I think that’s rather splendid.